HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
#46
#1
#35
#1
12
12
0
3
42.3
32.3
22
24
A Time to Kill $108.8 Million
Chicago $170.7 Million
$803.0 Million
Box Office
$1.0 Billion
COMMUNITY VOTE
Who had the greater Hollywood career overall?
Cast your vote and compare your opinion with the community.
✓ Thanks for voting!
0 community votes
Community voting reflects visitor opinion and is independent of the Hollywood Rankings methodology.
CAREER RANKING HISTORY
FILMOGRAPHY COMPARISON
Matthew McConaughey
22 theatrical releases • $803.0 Million Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Two for the Money | $23.0 Million |
| 2005 | Sahara | $68.7 Million |
| 2004 | Paparazzi | $15.7 Million |
| 2003 | How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days | $105.8 Million |
| 2002 | Reign of Fire | $43.1 Million |
Renee Zellweger
24 theatrical releases • $1.0 Billion Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Cinderella Man | $61.6 Million |
| 2004 | Shark Tale | $160.9 Million |
| 2004 | Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason | $40.2 Million |
| 2003 | Down With Love | $20.3 Million |
| 2003 | Cold Mountain | $95.6 Million |
Career Comparison Summary AI-generated historical comparison. Click to expand.
Note: Films released during the selected year influence the following year's rankings.
At this point in the rankings, Matthew McConaughey versus Renee Zellweger is best read as a compact career snapshot rather than an all-time verdict. Selected-year rank is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Renee Zellweger holding the stronger position in this snapshot.
Career peak is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Renee Zellweger holding the stronger position in this snapshot. Based on the available ranking data, the balance leans toward Renee Zellweger without turning the result into a subjective judgment of acting quality.