HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
#45
#1
#35
#1
13
13
0
4
42.5
29.8
24
25
A Time to Kill $108.8 Million
Chicago $170.7 Million
$935.3 Million
Box Office
$1.0 Billion
COMMUNITY VOTE
Who had the greater Hollywood career overall?
Cast your vote and compare your opinion with the community.
✓ Thanks for voting!
0 community votes
Community voting reflects visitor opinion and is independent of the Hollywood Rankings methodology.
CAREER RANKING HISTORY
FILMOGRAPHY COMPARISON
Matthew McConaughey
24 theatrical releases • $935.3 Million Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | We Are Marshall | $43.5 Million |
| 2006 | Failure to Launch | $88.7 Million |
| 2005 | Two for the Money | $23.0 Million |
| 2005 | Sahara | $68.7 Million |
| 2004 | Paparazzi | $15.7 Million |
Renee Zellweger
25 theatrical releases • $1.0 Billion Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Miss Potter | $3.0 Million |
| 2005 | Cinderella Man | $61.6 Million |
| 2004 | Shark Tale | $160.9 Million |
| 2004 | Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason | $40.2 Million |
| 2003 | Down With Love | $20.3 Million |
Career Comparison Summary AI-generated historical comparison. Click to expand.
Note: Films released during the selected year influence the following year's rankings.
The 2006 comparison presents Matthew McConaughey and Renee Zellweger through the ranking data available at that point in time. Selected-year rank is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Renee Zellweger holding the stronger position in this snapshot.
Career peak is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Renee Zellweger holding the stronger position in this snapshot. Taken together, the comparison suggests leans toward Renee Zellweger while still showing distinct strengths on each side.