HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
#39
#1
#29
#1
8
25
0
6
42.9
27.2
7
36
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone $317.6 Million
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest $423.3 Million
$1.8 Billion
Box Office
$2.3 Billion
COMMUNITY VOTE
Who had the greater Hollywood career overall?
Cast your vote and compare your opinion with the community.
✓ Thanks for voting!
0 community votes
Community voting reflects visitor opinion and is independent of the Hollywood Rankings methodology.
CAREER RANKING HISTORY
FILMOGRAPHY COMPARISON
Emma Watson
7 theatrical releases • $1.8 Billion Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince | $302.0 Million |
| 2008 | The Tale of Despereaux | $50.9 Million |
| 2007 | Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix | $292.0 Million |
| 2005 | Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire | $290.0 Million |
| 2004 | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban | $249.5 Million |
Johnny Depp
36 theatrical releases • $2.3 Billion Domestic
| Year | Movie | Domestic Box Office Domestic BO |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus | $7.7 Million |
| 2009 | Public Enemies | $97.1 Million |
| 2007 | Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street | $52.9 Million |
| 2007 | Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End | $309.4 Million |
| 2006 | Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest | $423.3 Million |
Career Comparison Summary AI-generated historical comparison. Click to expand.
Note: Films released during the selected year influence the following year's rankings.
The 2009 comparison presents Emma Watson and Johnny Depp through the ranking data available at that point in time. Selected-year rank is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Johnny Depp holding the stronger position in this snapshot.
Career peak is the clearest ranking-side separator, with Johnny Depp holding the stronger position in this snapshot. Based on the available ranking data, the balance leans toward Johnny Depp without turning the result into a subjective judgment of acting quality.